Burwood Council v Mehedin Abdul-Rahman [2021] NSWLEC 46

Burwood Council v Mehedin Abdul-Rahman [2021] NSWLEC 46

The Court imposed monetary penalties totaling $40,000 for three offences of unlawful development without consent under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, having regard to the low objective seriousness of the tree offence, moderate seriousness of the demolition and construction offences, minimal actual environmental harm, deliberate commission (except for the tree offence), evidence of remorse and good character, low likelihood of reoffending, and application of a 25% discount for early guilty pleas.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 May 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Environmental Prosecution (class 5) / Sentencing
Outcome
Conviction and imposition of monetary fines as specified; order for payment of Council's costs; exhibits returned.
Legal Topics
['unlawful Development' 'sentencing Principles' 'environmental Harm' 'planning Legislation' 'deterrence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Environmental Prosecution (class 5) / Sentencing

  1. 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for offences of unlawful development without consent under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979?' 'What is the objective seriousness of the offences and the subjective circumstances of the defendant?' 'To what extent did the offences cause environmental harm?' 'Is a monetary penalty appropriate, and at what quantum?' 'What discount applies for early guilty pleas?']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court imposed monetary penalties totaling $40,000 for three offences of unlawful development without consent under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, having regard to the low objective seriousness of the tree offence, moderate seriousness of the demolition and construction offences, minimal actual environmental harm, deliberate commission (except for the tree offence), evidence of remorse and good character, low likelihood of reoffending, and application of a 25% discount for early guilty pleas.

Court Disposition

Conviction and imposition of monetary fines as specified; order for payment of Council's costs; exhibits returned.

Orders

  • ['Abdul-Rahman convicted as charged in each proceeding (12869/2021, 12870/2021, 12871/2021)' 'Fined $15,000 for the tree offence' 'Fined $15,000 for the demolition offence' 'Fined $10,000 for the construction offence' "Ordered to pay Council's costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed under s 257B/s 257G of the...