Faruqi v Hanson (Costs) [2024] FCA 1389
Relief in the form of declaratory and injunctive orders was the most important substantive relief sought and granted, and the matter was appropriately brought in the Federal Court given its importance and nature as a test case; therefore, the respondent's application to vary the costs order was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mehreen Faruqi; Respondent: Pauline Hanson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Variation of Costs Order / Post Judgment (costs)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Federal Court, Application of Federal Court Rules R 40.08, Test Case Criteria, Declaratory Relief, Mandatory Injunction, Constitutional Challenge
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mehreen Faruqi
Applicant
Pauline Hanson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Variation of Costs Order / Post Judgment (costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be reduced under r 40.08 of Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
- 2 Whether the proceeding could more suitably have been brought in another court
- 3 Whether the nature of relief sought engages r 40.08(a)
Ratio Decidendi
Relief in the form of declaratory and injunctive orders was the most important substantive relief sought and granted, and the matter was appropriately brought in the Federal Court given its importance and nature as a test case; therefore, the respondent's application to vary the costs order was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The respondent's application to vary the costs order made on 1 November 2024 be dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment