Atkinson v Mullrai Pty Ltd & Ors: Carlisle v Mullrai Pty Ltd & Ors [1999] NSWCA 374
Taking into account understandable reasons for delay, absence of significant prejudice to respondents, and the fact that the appeal is not hopeless, it is appropriate as a matter of discretion to grant extension of time to appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination of Extension of Time Application
- Outcome
- Applications for extension of time to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'appeal Procedure' 'negligence' 'foreseeability']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination of Extension of Time Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an extension of time to file a notice of appeal should be granted' 'Whether prejudice is occasioned to the respondents if extension is granted' 'Whether the prospects of appeal are reasonable']
Ratio Decidendi
Taking into account understandable reasons for delay, absence of significant prejudice to respondents, and the fact that the appeal is not hopeless, it is appropriate as a matter of discretion to grant extension of time to appeal.
Court Disposition
Applications for extension of time to appeal granted
Orders
- ['Extension of time for filing notice of appeal granted to 13 October 1999 for both applicants' 'Applicants to bear respondents’ costs of the applications for extension of time' 'Costs orders are not to be subsumed in any order for costs in the appeal' 'Enforcement of payment of costs will not be undertaken until...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment