Robbie v Strasburger Enterprises Pty Ltd t/as Quix Food Stores & Ors [2017] NSWSC 363
Paragraph 4.37 of the NSW Workers Compensation Guidelines requires the DRE/ADL value to be combined with a single, aggregated 'appropriate additional amount' from Table 4.2 using the Combined Values Chart. Individual surgical modifiers in Table 4.2 do not constitute separate 'impairments' for the purpose of multiple, successive combinations. The third defendant did not err in concluding that no demonstrable error justified appeal under s 327(3)(d) of the WIM Act; the text of the Guidelines supported the method applied by the Approved Medical Specialist.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'statutory Interpretation' 'workers Compensation Assessment' 'medical Assessment Certificate' 'whole Person Impairment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Proper method of calculating Whole Person Impairment (WPI) for lumbar spine injury with persisting radiculopathy after multiple surgeries' 'Interpretation of paragraph 4.37 and Table 4.2 of the NSW Workers Compensation Guidelines in conjunction with AMA5 Combined Values Chart' 'Whether demonstrable error existed in Medical Assessment Certificate justifying appeal under s 327 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
Paragraph 4.37 of the NSW Workers Compensation Guidelines requires the DRE/ADL value to be combined with a single, aggregated 'appropriate additional amount' from Table 4.2 using the Combined Values Chart. Individual surgical modifiers in Table 4.2 do not constitute separate 'impairments' for the purpose of multiple, successive combinations. The third defendant did not err in concluding that no demonstrable error justified appeal under s 327(3)(d) of the WIM Act; the text of the Guidelines supported the method applied by the Approved Medical Specialist.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's summons dismissed
Orders
- ["Dismiss the plaintiff's summons." "The plaintiff is to pay the first defendant's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment