Crock v Kyriakopoulou [2000] FCA 596
The respondent failed to establish any 'other sufficient cause' under s 52(2)(b) Bankruptcy Act 1966 to resist a sequestration order; all formal requirements were met, challenges to the prior County Court proceedings and alleged defects in service or the costs order did not provide grounds to refuse making the order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Creditors Petition for Sequestration of Estate (bankruptcy) / Final Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- order made for sequestration of respondent's estate
- Legal Topics
- ['sequestration Order' 'creditors Petition' 'opposition to Bankruptcy' 'formal Service Requirements' 'sufficient Cause Against Sequestration']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Creditors Petition for Sequestration of Estate (bankruptcy) / Final Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the formal requirements for making a sequestration order are satisfied' "Whether the respondent has shown 'other sufficient cause' why a sequestration order should not be made under Bankruptcy Act 1966 s 52"]
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent failed to establish any 'other sufficient cause' under s 52(2)(b) Bankruptcy Act 1966 to resist a sequestration order; all formal requirements were met, challenges to the prior County Court proceedings and alleged defects in service or the costs order did not provide grounds to refuse making the order.
Court Disposition
order made for sequestration of respondent's estate
Orders
- ['The estate of the respondent be sequestrated.' "The applicants' costs, including any reserved costs, be taxed and paid in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment