Crock v Kyriakopoulou [2000] FCA 596

Crock v Kyriakopoulou [2000] FCA 596

The respondent failed to establish any 'other sufficient cause' under s 52(2)(b) Bankruptcy Act 1966 to resist a sequestration order; all formal requirements were met, challenges to the prior County Court proceedings and alleged defects in service or the costs order did not provide grounds to refuse making the order.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 May 2000
Procedural Posture
Creditors Petition for Sequestration of Estate (bankruptcy) / Final Hearing and Judgment
Outcome
order made for sequestration of respondent's estate
Legal Topics
['sequestration Order' 'creditors Petition' 'opposition to Bankruptcy' 'formal Service Requirements' 'sufficient Cause Against Sequestration']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Creditors Petition for Sequestration of Estate (bankruptcy) / Final Hearing and Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether the formal requirements for making a sequestration order are satisfied' "Whether the respondent has shown 'other sufficient cause' why a sequestration order should not be made under Bankruptcy Act 1966 s 52"]

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent failed to establish any 'other sufficient cause' under s 52(2)(b) Bankruptcy Act 1966 to resist a sequestration order; all formal requirements were met, challenges to the prior County Court proceedings and alleged defects in service or the costs order did not provide grounds to refuse making the order.

Court Disposition

order made for sequestration of respondent's estate

Orders

  • ['The estate of the respondent be sequestrated.' "The applicants' costs, including any reserved costs, be taxed and paid in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966."]