Foux v Philpott, Warren & Warren [2003] NSWLC 4

Foux v Philpott, Warren & Warren [2003] NSWLC 4

The plaintiff, through procuring Conran's forbearance from winding up Riverlink, provided valid consideration for the mortgage and guarantee documents, establishing a legally enforceable contract binding the first defendant as guarantor.

Parties
Plaintiff: Melvin Roy Foux; First Defendant: Albert Andrew Philpott; Second Defendant: Charles Warren; Third Defendant: Katherine Warren
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 May 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Verdict for the Plaintiff
Legal Topics
Consideration, Guarantee, Mortgage Security, Contracts Review
Contract Consideration Guarantee Mortgage Security Contracts Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Melvin Roy Foux

Plaintiff

Albert Andrew Philpott

First Defendant

Charles Warren

Second Defendant

Katherine Warren

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there is a legally enforceable contract between Foux and Riverlink in relation to the mortgage document and its annexures
  2. 2 Whether the Guarantee and Indemnity is binding on the first defendant

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff, through procuring Conran's forbearance from winding up Riverlink, provided valid consideration for the mortgage and guarantee documents, establishing a legally enforceable contract binding the first defendant as guarantor.

Court Disposition

Verdict for the Plaintiff

Orders

  • Verdict for the Plaintiff