Te, Meng Kok v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 1339
The applicant is liable to deportation under s 200 as read with s 201 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) because he was sentenced to twelve months' imprisonment, satisfying the statutory threshold, notwithstanding the partial suspension of the sentence. The detention order was authorised by ss 253 and 254. Grounds concerning the reasonableness of the deportation order and alleged failure to consider relevant matters are not appropriate for consideration as merits review is available before the AAT.
- Parties
- Applicant: Meng Kok Te; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Second Respondent: Anor (Second Respondent)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Ex Tempore Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Deportation Orders Under Migration Act, Interpretation of 'sentence to Imprisonment', Judicial Review Jurisdiction, Immigration Detention Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Meng Kok Te
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs
First Respondent
Anor (Second Respondent)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Ex Tempore Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant is liable to deportation under s 200 as read with s 201 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) in light of a partly suspended sentence
- 2 Whether the decision to detain applicant in immigration detention was authorised by ss 253 and 254 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
- 3 Whether the making of the deportation order was reasonable or involved failure to consider relevant matters
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is liable to deportation under s 200 as read with s 201 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) because he was sentenced to twelve months' imprisonment, satisfying the statutory threshold, notwithstanding the partial suspension of the sentence. The detention order was authorised by ss 253 and 254. Grounds concerning the reasonableness of the deportation order and alleged failure to consider relevant matters are not appropriate for consideration as merits review is available before the AAT.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment