Menulog Pty Ltd v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] NSWSC 908
The particulars already provided did not adequately expose the case Channel Nine would have to meet at trial. Channel Nine was entitled to the facts, matters and circumstances relied upon to establish the alleged affiliation with Cuisine Courier, the factual basis for the alleged states of mind supporting malice, and a direct answer identifying whether Menulog would rely only on a likely downturn in trade or on any particular kind of actual damage. Menulog was therefore required to provide further particulars.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Proceedings for Injurious Falsehood / Interlocutory Application by the Defendant for Further and Better Particulars
- Outcome
- Plaintiff ordered to provide further particulars.
- Legal Topics
- ['injurious Falsehood' 'malice' 'actual Damage' 'injunctive Relief' 'particulars' 'notice to Produce']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Proceedings for Injurious Falsehood / Interlocutory Application by the Defendant for Further and Better Particulars
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant was entitled to further particulars of the alleged affiliation between Menulog and Cuisine Courier.' 'Whether the defendant was entitled to further particulars of the facts, matters and circumstances relied upon to establish malice.' 'Whether the defendant was entitled to further particulars of the alleged probability of actual damage where the only relief sought was injunctive relief.' 'Whether documents referred to in the statement of claim should be produced.']
Ratio Decidendi
The particulars already provided did not adequately expose the case Channel Nine would have to meet at trial. Channel Nine was entitled to the facts, matters and circumstances relied upon to establish the alleged affiliation with Cuisine Courier, the factual basis for the alleged states of mind supporting malice, and a direct answer identifying whether Menulog would rely only on a likely downturn in trade or on any particular kind of actual damage. Menulog was therefore required to provide further particulars.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff ordered to provide further particulars.
Orders
- ['The plaintiff is to provide further answer to questions 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14 and 15 of the letter dated 18 June 2012 from Johnson Winter & Slattery to Diamond Conway Lawyers (page 14 of Exhibit A).']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment