Merman Investments Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2024] NSWLEC 1472
The parties agreed that the proposed modifications were substantially the same as the original development, all jurisdictional prerequisites under s 4.55 of the EPA Act were satisfied, and under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, the Court was required to grant the orders by consent.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Modification Application (class 1 Appeal) / Post Conciliation Conference, Orders Following Agreement
- Outcome
- Appeal granted. Development consent modified.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'conciliation Conference' 'jurisdictional Prerequisites']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Modification Application (class 1 Appeal) / Post Conciliation Conference, Orders Following Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed modification is substantially the same as the original development' 'Whether jurisdictional prerequisites for consent modification are satisfied under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979']
Ratio Decidendi
The parties agreed that the proposed modifications were substantially the same as the original development, all jurisdictional prerequisites under s 4.55 of the EPA Act were satisfied, and under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, the Court was required to grant the orders by consent.
Court Disposition
Appeal granted. Development consent modified.
Orders
- ['The appeal is granted' 'Development consent no. DA325/2020/1 is modified in the terms in Annexure A' 'Development consent no. DA325/2020/1 as modified by the Court is Annexure B']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment