Slater v Honourable Chief Justice Miles [1999] FCA 185
The appeal was dismissed as an abuse of process, since the proceedings sought relief that had already been finally determined against Mrs Slater in previous judgments, and further litigation was foredoomed to fail. The Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction after transfer to the Family Court.
- Parties
- Appellant: Merrilee Margaret Slater; First Respondent: The Honourable Jeffrey Allan Miles; Second Respondent: Registrar Alan Jeffrey Towill; Third Respondent: Sheriff Jill Circosta; Fourth Respondent: Attorney-General for the Australian Capital Territory
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Jurisdiction, Prerogative Relief, Mandamus
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Merrilee Margaret Slater
Appellant
The Honourable Jeffrey Allan Miles
First Respondent
Registrar Alan Jeffrey Towill
Second Respondent
Sheriff Jill Circosta
Third Respondent
Attorney-General for the Australian Capital Territory
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal constitutes an abuse of process
- 2 Whether the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory has jurisdiction to entertain matrimonial property claims after transfer to the Family Court
- 3 Whether judges of the Supreme Court ACT are officers of the Commonwealth for the purpose of s 39B of the Judiciary Act
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed as an abuse of process, since the proceedings sought relief that had already been finally determined against Mrs Slater in previous judgments, and further litigation was foredoomed to fail. The Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction after transfer to the Family Court.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- The motion for a stay of the appeal is dismissed.
- The appeal is dismissed with costs, to be taxed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment