R v HICKEY [2012] NSWDC 103
Given the objective seriousness of robbing a legally blind person, the offender's criminal history, and the circumstances of the offence, a lengthy custodial sentence is warranted. The sentence is mitigated by the offender's early guilty plea, background, age, substance abuse issues, and potential for rehabilitation, justifying a finding of special circumstances and a recommendation for a residential rehabilitation program post-release.
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Defendant: Mervin Joseph Hickey
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Robbery in Company, Vulnerable Victim, Sentencing, Special Circumstances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Mervin Joseph Hickey
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for robbery in company involving a vulnerable victim
- 2 Consideration of offender's background and prospects for rehabilitation
- 3 Influence of intoxication on moral culpability
Ratio Decidendi
Given the objective seriousness of robbing a legally blind person, the offender's criminal history, and the circumstances of the offence, a lengthy custodial sentence is warranted. The sentence is mitigated by the offender's early guilty plea, background, age, substance abuse issues, and potential for rehabilitation, justifying a finding of special circumstances and a recommendation for a residential rehabilitation program post-release.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- Offender sentenced to imprisonment for six years
- Non-parole period set at three years, commencing 11 November 2011
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment