R v HICKEY [2012] NSWDC 103

R v HICKEY [2012] NSWDC 103

Given the objective seriousness of robbing a legally blind person, the offender's criminal history, and the circumstances of the offence, a lengthy custodial sentence is warranted. The sentence is mitigated by the offender's early guilty plea, background, age, substance abuse issues, and potential for rehabilitation, justifying a finding of special circumstances and a recommendation for a residential rehabilitation program post-release.

Parties
Prosecution: The Crown; Defendant: Mervin Joseph Hickey
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 May 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Sentenced to imprisonment
Legal Topics
Robbery in Company, Vulnerable Victim, Sentencing, Special Circumstances

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Crown

Prosecution

Mervin Joseph Hickey

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for robbery in company involving a vulnerable victim
  2. 2 Consideration of offender's background and prospects for rehabilitation
  3. 3 Influence of intoxication on moral culpability

Ratio Decidendi

Given the objective seriousness of robbing a legally blind person, the offender's criminal history, and the circumstances of the offence, a lengthy custodial sentence is warranted. The sentence is mitigated by the offender's early guilty plea, background, age, substance abuse issues, and potential for rehabilitation, justifying a finding of special circumstances and a recommendation for a residential rehabilitation program post-release.

Court Disposition

Sentenced to imprisonment

Orders

  • Offender sentenced to imprisonment for six years
  • Non-parole period set at three years, commencing 11 November 2011