Campbell v Metway Leasing Limited [2002] FCAFC 47; [2002] FCA 213
The hearing date should be vacated because the appellants would suffer severe prejudice due to the unavailability of their senior counsel, and no substantial prejudice to the respondent or intervenor was shown.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Pre Hearing; Notice of Motion to Vacate Hearing Date and Adjourn Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal hearing date vacated; appeal adjourned; directions given as to filings and authorities; costs orders made
- Legal Topics
- ['procedural Directions' 'costs' 'adjournment of Appeal Hearing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Pre Hearing; Notice of Motion to Vacate Hearing Date and Adjourn Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the hearing date for the appeal should be vacated due to unavailability of senior counsel for appellants' 'Appropriate allocation of costs relating to the motion to vacate hearing date' 'Directions for filing of written submissions and authorities']
Ratio Decidendi
The hearing date should be vacated because the appellants would suffer severe prejudice due to the unavailability of their senior counsel, and no substantial prejudice to the respondent or intervenor was shown.
Court Disposition
Appeal hearing date vacated; appeal adjourned; directions given as to filings and authorities; costs orders made
Orders
- ['The hearing date for the appeal be vacated.' 'The appeal be adjourned to a date to be fixed.' 'There be no order as to the costs of the motion.' 'The Respondent have the costs thrown away by the variation of the hearing date, to be taxed if not agreed.' 'Appellants to file written submissions five clear days...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment