MH v NSW Maritime No 2 [2011] NSWADT 285
The Tribunal’s jurisdiction on external review is constrained to consider conduct complained of in the internal review request, reasonably construed; here, whether disclosure of MH’s affidavit to the workers compensation insurer breached s 12(c) and s 18 of the PPIP Act.
- Parties
- Applicant: MH; Respondent: NSW Maritime
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- External Review Application Under Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 / Jurisdictional Determination and Procedural Orders
- Outcome
- Jurisdictional scope determined; procedural orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Scope of Internal Review, Information Protection Principles, Disclosure of Personal Information
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MH
Applicant
NSW Maritime
Respondent
Procedural Posture
External Review Application Under Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 / Jurisdictional Determination and Procedural Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the scope of the Tribunal’s jurisdiction on external review under the PPIP Act based on the applicant’s internal review request?
- 2 Whether the internal review request covered breaches of s 12(c) and s 18 of the PPIP Act
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal’s jurisdiction on external review is constrained to consider conduct complained of in the internal review request, reasonably construed; here, whether disclosure of MH’s affidavit to the workers compensation insurer breached s 12(c) and s 18 of the PPIP Act.
Court Disposition
Jurisdictional scope determined; procedural orders made.
Orders
- Applicant to file and serve materials by 23 December 2011.
- Respondent to file and serve materials by 13 February 2012.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment