MHG Plastic Industries Pty Ltd v Quality Assurance Services Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 105
Given the uncontradicted evidence of costs, but noting the Court's discretion, the appropriate amount of security to be ordered for each respondent is $300,000, based on evidence and in the interests of justice.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Further Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Application for further security for costs allowed in part; security increased for both respondents; costs orders as per motions.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'costs of Discovery' 'interlocutory Applications']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Further Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether additional security for costs should be ordered for each respondent and in what amount' 'Appropriate quantum of security for costs given evidence of actual and anticipated costs' 'Appropriate orders as to costs of the motions for security']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the uncontradicted evidence of costs, but noting the Court's discretion, the appropriate amount of security to be ordered for each respondent is $300,000, based on evidence and in the interests of justice.
Court Disposition
Application for further security for costs allowed in part; security increased for both respondents; costs orders as per motions.
Orders
- ['The orders for security for costs made on 28 June 2002 are varied by increasing the amount of the security to be given to each respondent to $300,000.' 'Security for the increased amount in favour of each respondent is to be provided in a form acceptable to the Registrar within 28 days, failing which the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment