Yang v Webster [2018] NSWCATAP 293
Leave to appeal was refused because no procedural unfairness or error of law was established, the tribunal member applied the balance of probabilities properly, and the findings regarding timing of robbery and quantification of loss were not against the weight of evidence or unfair.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mi Roo Yang; Appellant: Eddie Park; Respondent: Isabelle Webster
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Final Disposition
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Liability of Landlord and Agent for Loss of Property, Open Inspection, Onus of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mi Roo Yang
Appellant
Eddie Park
Appellant
Isabelle Webster
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Final Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was denial of procedural fairness in the original proceedings
- 2 Whether the tribunal member correctly applied the onus of proof
- 3 Whether the finding that the robbery occurred after the inspection was against the weight of evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because no procedural unfairness or error of law was established, the tribunal member applied the balance of probabilities properly, and the findings regarding timing of robbery and quantification of loss were not against the weight of evidence or unfair.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal refused.
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment