MICEVSKI v OTIS ELEVATOR CO PTY LIMITED [1988] NSWCA 94
The employer was negligent as it failed to secure timber which posed a foreseeable risk, and was vicariously liable for the negligent placement of timber by its employee. There was no contributory negligence, as the risks were inherent in the system and not adequately guarded against by simple, inexpensive measures which were practicable.
- Parties
- Appellant: Micevski; Respondent: Otis Elevator Co Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Employer's Liability, Foreseeable Risk of Injury, Contributory Negligence, Vicarious Liability, Practicable Precautions, Statutory Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Micevski
Appellant
Otis Elevator Co Pty Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employer was negligent in failing to secure objects near the path of the crane mechanism.
- 2 Whether the employer was vicariously liable for the casual negligence of a fellow employee.
- 3 Whether the appellant was contributorily negligent.
Ratio Decidendi
The employer was negligent as it failed to secure timber which posed a foreseeable risk, and was vicariously liable for the negligent placement of timber by its employee. There was no contributory negligence, as the risks were inherent in the system and not adequately guarded against by simple, inexpensive measures which were practicable.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment entered for appellant (plaintiff).
- Judgment for respondent (defendant) set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment