CIRCOSTA v FALZON [1999] NSWCA 308
The trial judge properly considered evidence of exaggeration in the respondent's condition, including the video film and affidavit, and accepted medical evidence supporting incapacity. The assessment of economic loss based on factored average weekly earnings was justified given the difficulty of quantifying actual lost income due to trust arrangements and evolving business activities. The approach and reasoning by the trial judge were permissible and sufficiently disclosed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['damages' 'non Economic Loss' 'economic Loss' 'quantum Assessment' 'personal Injury' 'motor Vehicle Accident']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the assessment of non-economic loss paid due regard to evidence showing exaggeration in histories given to medical practitioners' "Whether the assessment of economic loss was properly based on factored average weekly earnings rather than the appellant's historical earnings"]
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge properly considered evidence of exaggeration in the respondent's condition, including the video film and affidavit, and accepted medical evidence supporting incapacity. The assessment of economic loss based on factored average weekly earnings was justified given the difficulty of quantifying actual lost income due to trust arrangements and evolving business activities. The approach and reasoning by the trial judge were permissible and sufficiently disclosed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed' 'Appellant to pay costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment