Alldinger v Du Ranot [2023] NSWCA 271

Alldinger v Du Ranot [2023] NSWCA 271

The appellant failed to establish grounds for admitting further evidence on appeal, was bound by his conduct and case at trial, and the primary judge's approach to assessing damages for economic loss was consistent with evidence and principle. There was no error warranting appellate intervention in the awards for economic loss, future domestic assistance or out-of-pocket expenses; other alleged errors regarding causation, duty of care, and insurer's witness were not properly before the Court or substantiated.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 November 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From District Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; notice of motion dismissed; costs ordered against appellant.
Legal Topics
['damages Assessment' 'future Economic Loss' 'adduction of Further Evidence on Appeal' 'quantum of Damages' 'procedural Fairness']
['torts' 'personal Injury' 'motor Accidents' 'civil Procedure'] ['damages Assessment' 'future Economic Loss' 'adduction of Further Evidence on Appeal' 'quantum of Damages' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From District Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the primary judge erred in assessment of past and future economic loss' 'Whether leave should be granted to adduce further evidence on appeal' 'Whether the alleged incompetence of legal representatives warrants reopening the case' 'Correct calculation of future domestic assistance and out of pocket expenses' 'Whether findings on causation, duty of care, and insurer advances were erroneous']

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to establish grounds for admitting further evidence on appeal, was bound by his conduct and case at trial, and the primary judge's approach to assessing damages for economic loss was consistent with evidence and principle. There was no error warranting appellate intervention in the awards for economic loss, future domestic assistance or out-of-pocket expenses; other alleged errors regarding causation, duty of care, and insurer's witness were not properly before the Court or substantiated.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; notice of motion dismissed; costs ordered against appellant.

Orders

  • ["Dismiss the appellant's notice of motion filed on 4 October 2023." 'Appeal dismissed.' "Appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal, including the costs of the appellant's notice of motion filed on 4 October 2023."]