Alvanos and Ors v Shoalhaven Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 42
The power conferred on the council by cl 8A of the Shoalhaven LEP to adjust zone boundaries cannot be exercised by the Land and Environment Court on appeal under s 39(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, as it is not a function or discretion 'in respect of the matter the subject of the appeal,' but instead relates to the antecedent and administrative process of zone boundary determination, which remains with council. Therefore, the Court has no jurisdiction to make such a determination in these proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Preliminary Determination; Judgment on Questions of Law
- Outcome
- Court cannot exercise the council’s cl 8A power under s 39(2); question answered in the negative; application relating to this preliminary question refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['power to Adjust Zone Boundary in Local Environmental Plan' 'jurisdiction of the Land and Environment Court' 'local Environmental Plan Interpretation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Preliminary Determination; Judgment on Questions of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Land and Environment Court may exercise the council’s power under cl 8A of the Shoalhaven Local Environmental Plan 1985 under s 39(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979' 'If so, whether the circumstances justify exercise of that power to adjust the zone boundary']
Ratio Decidendi
The power conferred on the council by cl 8A of the Shoalhaven LEP to adjust zone boundaries cannot be exercised by the Land and Environment Court on appeal under s 39(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, as it is not a function or discretion 'in respect of the matter the subject of the appeal,' but instead relates to the antecedent and administrative process of zone boundary determination, which remains with council. Therefore, the Court has no jurisdiction to make such a determination in these proceedings.
Court Disposition
Court cannot exercise the council’s cl 8A power under s 39(2); question answered in the negative; application relating to this preliminary question refused.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment