R v O'Brien [2002] NSWCCA 102
Notwithstanding favourable subjective circumstances and references to comparable cases, the sentence imposed was within the permissible range, and no error of law or principle was demonstrated by the sentencing judge.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'sexual Offences' 'consistency in Punishment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed for sexual intercourse without consent was manifestly excessive' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred by not placing the offence at the lower end of the scale' 'Consistency in sentencing for offences of this nature']
Ratio Decidendi
Notwithstanding favourable subjective circumstances and references to comparable cases, the sentence imposed was within the permissible range, and no error of law or principle was demonstrated by the sentencing judge.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted.' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment