Atkins v Attorney General of New South Wales [2016] NSWSC 1412
There was no jurisdictional error in the proceedings of the coroner—there has only ever been one inquest, properly resumed under s 79 of the Coroners Act 2009 (NSW) after the criminal charges were finally determined. The Deputy State Coroner holds authority to compel Mr Atkins’ evidence, and the challenge to the resumption and conduct of the inquest is dismissed. No decision amenable to judicial review was made by the State Coroner on 16 January 2015.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed; application for extension of time refused
- Legal Topics
- ["judicial Review of Coroner's Decision" 'jurisdiction of Coroners After Acquittal' 'coronial Inquest Procedure' 'finality of Criminal Proceedings' 'powers of State Coroner']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the State Coroner directed that an inquest be held and if decision entailed jurisdictional error' 'Whether Deputy State Coroner misapprehended authority to require a person to give evidence' 'Whether coroner had jurisdiction to require the plaintiff to give evidence after acquittal of murder' 'Whether inquest can proceed to determine manner and cause of death in these circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no jurisdictional error in the proceedings of the coroner—there has only ever been one inquest, properly resumed under s 79 of the Coroners Act 2009 (NSW) after the criminal charges were finally determined. The Deputy State Coroner holds authority to compel Mr Atkins’ evidence, and the challenge to the resumption and conduct of the inquest is dismissed. No decision amenable to judicial review was made by the State Coroner on 16 January 2015.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed; application for extension of time refused
Orders
- ['Application for an extension of time for commencing proceedings for judicial review in respect of the first impugned decision refused' 'Proceedings dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment