In the Matter of Enviro Energy Australia Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2010] NSWSC 1222
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to establish the company's solvency, did not furnish reliable and corroborated evidence of the company's financial position, failed to comply with statutory obligations, did not show that returning stewardship to him was in the public interest or commercial morality, and had delayed and conducted the application in a delinquent manner justifying indemnity costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Ayoub; 1st Respondent: Chief Commissioner of State Revenue; 2nd Respondent: Bruce Gleeson (Liquidator of defendant); Interested Party: Perpetual Trustee Company Limited; Interested Party: Challenger Managed Investments Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Interlocutory Application to Stay or Terminate Winding Up / Judgment Following Hearing of Interlocutory Application Under Corporations Act 2001 (cth) S 482
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; costs orders made against applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Stay or Termination of Winding Up, Solvency, Public Interest, Commercial Morality, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Ayoub
Applicant
Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
1st Respondent
Bruce Gleeson (Liquidator of defendant)
2nd Respondent
Perpetual Trustee Company Limited
Interested Party
Challenger Managed Investments Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Corporations Interlocutory Application to Stay or Terminate Winding Up / Judgment Following Hearing of Interlocutory Application Under Corporations Act 2001 (cth) S 482
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the winding-up of Enviro Energy Australia Pty Ltd (in liquidation) should be stayed or terminated under s 482 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 2 Whether the applicant discharged the onus to establish the company's solvency
- 3 Whether it is in the public interest or interests of commercial morality to restore control to the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to establish the company's solvency, did not furnish reliable and corroborated evidence of the company's financial position, failed to comply with statutory obligations, did not show that returning stewardship to him was in the public interest or commercial morality, and had delayed and conducted the application in a delinquent manner justifying indemnity costs.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; costs orders made against applicant.
Orders
- Order that the interlocutory process filed on 8 April 2010 be dismissed.
- Order that the applicant pay the costs of the second respondent and the liquidator on the indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment