Michael Bald & Associates -v- Byron Council [1999] NSWLEC 78
Clause 45 requires not only the presence but also the adequacy of sewerage services, including treatment plant capacity. In the absence of prior approval of the sewerage management facility under s 68 of the Local Government Act, the Court has no jurisdiction to entertain or grant the development application, and cannot itself grant such approval under its appellate jurisdiction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Determination of Questions of Law on Appeal Under the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979
- Outcome
- Questions of law answered; no jurisdiction to grant consent in absence of prior adequate arrangements with the Council under clause 45 of the LEP 1988.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'sewerage Services' 'statutory Interpretation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Determination of Questions of Law on Appeal Under the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether clause 45 of Byron Local Environmental Plan 1988 applies to the proposed development' 'Whether the adequacy and capacity of the sewerage treatment plant is relevant under clause 45' 'Whether the Court on appeal may exercise power under other legislation (Local Government Act 1993) in the absence of prior adequate arrangements required under clause 45']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 45 requires not only the presence but also the adequacy of sewerage services, including treatment plant capacity. In the absence of prior approval of the sewerage management facility under s 68 of the Local Government Act, the Court has no jurisdiction to entertain or grant the development application, and cannot itself grant such approval under its appellate jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Questions of law answered; no jurisdiction to grant consent in absence of prior adequate arrangements with the Council under clause 45 of the LEP 1988.
Orders
- ['Question 1: Yes, clause 45 applies.' 'Question 2: Yes, adequacy and capacity of treatment plant is relevant.' 'Question 3: No, the Court cannot grant consent without prior adequate arrangements as required.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment