Application of Michael Bar-Mordecai [2013] NSWSC 1253
The application was dismissed because the proposed pleading did not constitute the tort of assault, there was no legal basis for State vicarious liability for a judge's conduct, and the limitation period had long expired with no basis for extension.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Commence Proceedings Under Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 / Determination of Application on the Papers
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['vexatious Proceedings' 'leave to Institute Proceedings' 'extension of Limitation Period' 'vicarious Liability of State' 'tort of Assault']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Commence Proceedings Under Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 / Determination of Application on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to commence proceedings under the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008' 'Whether the proposed claim discloses a prima facie ground for relief' 'Applicability of limitation period and potential for extension' 'State vicarious liability for judicial acts']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the proposed pleading did not constitute the tort of assault, there was no legal basis for State vicarious liability for a judge's conduct, and the limitation period had long expired with no basis for extension.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application for leave to commence proceedings pursuant to s 14 of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008, contained in the Summons filed 29 July 2013, is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment