Barel v Randwick City Council [2022] NSWLEC 1176
The development application is refused due to insufficient information on how excavation, retaining and boundary conditions will be managed, failing to satisfy mandatory preconditions under cl 6.2 of Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 and cl 7 of State Environmental Planning Policy No 55, making it impossible for the Court to be satisfied the impacts are acceptable.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Determination, After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. Development application refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'dual Occupancy' 'excavation' 'site Suitability' 'character' 'earthworks' 'contaminated Land']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Determination, After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the excavation proposed is acceptable' 'Whether the site is suitable for a dual occupancy development' 'Whether the development complies with relevant planning controls' 'Whether there is sufficient evidence to assess impacts and site contamination' 'Whether the development is consistent with desired character and will adversely impact neighbouring properties']
Ratio Decidendi
The development application is refused due to insufficient information on how excavation, retaining and boundary conditions will be managed, failing to satisfy mandatory preconditions under cl 6.2 of Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 and cl 7 of State Environmental Planning Policy No 55, making it impossible for the Court to be satisfied the impacts are acceptable.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. Development application refused.
Orders
- ['Appeal is dismissed' 'Development Application 551/2020 at 5 Dacre Street Malabar for demolition and construction of dual occupancy is determined by way of refusal' 'Exhibits are returned, except Exhibit A, B, L and 2']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment