Bateman v Evans [2004] NSWSC 626
There was no error in point of law or basis to disturb the magistrate's discretion regarding costs; leave to appeal and extension of time should not be granted as the appeal lacked merit.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Local Court / Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed; plaintiff to pay costs of the summons.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'extension of Time' 'appeal on Costs' 'bullock Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Local Court / Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave to appeal against Local Court's refusal to make a Bullock order should be granted" 'Whether extension of time for appeal on costs should be granted' 'Whether there was error in point of law by the Local Court magistrate regarding costs discretion']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error in point of law or basis to disturb the magistrate's discretion regarding costs; leave to appeal and extension of time should not be granted as the appeal lacked merit.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed; plaintiff to pay costs of the summons.
Orders
- ['The summons is dismissed.' 'The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the summons.' 'The exhibits may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment