Silver v Dome Resources NL [2005] NSWSC 349
Documents are admitted as business records under s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), and privilege is taken to have been waived by consent, extending up to 31 May 1999 given the fairness principle derived from common law and adopted in s 122(1).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Equity / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admissibility and Privilege of Documents
- Outcome
- Documents admitted as business records; legal professional privilege taken to have been given up for documents required to be produced up to 31 May 1999.
- Legal Topics
- ['privilege' 'legal Professional Privilege' 'waiver of Privilege' 'business Records' 'admissibility of Documents']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admissibility and Privilege of Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether certain documents are admissible as business records under s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)' 'Whether legal professional privilege has been waived under s 122(1) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)' 'Relevance of documents for proof of communications between specified parties']
Ratio Decidendi
Documents are admitted as business records under s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), and privilege is taken to have been waived by consent, extending up to 31 May 1999 given the fairness principle derived from common law and adopted in s 122(1).
Court Disposition
Documents admitted as business records; legal professional privilege taken to have been given up for documents required to be produced up to 31 May 1999.
Orders
- ['Cover sheet, notes of telephone conversation (6 October 1998), notes of conference (6 October 1998), and draft facsimile (13 November 1998) admitted as Exhibit 5.' 'Note of conference (9 October 1998) rejected and marked MFI 6 to be returned' 'Production and access to Minter Ellison file up to 31 May 1999 ordered;...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment