Silver v Dome Resources NL [2005] NSWSC 348

The director's letter was admitted as a business record under s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995, as it formed part of the company records and related to business matters, with discretion under s 135 not exercised to exclude it, despite arguments regarding prejudice and inability to cross-examine.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 12 April 2005
Procedural Posture: Equity Proceeding / Evidence Admissibility Ruling
Outcome: Application to exclude evidence dismissed; letter admitted as business record evidence.
Legal Topics: ['business Records' 'documentary Evidence' 'statutory Interpretation' 'discretion to Exclude Evidence']

['evidence' 'company Law'] ['business Records' 'documentary Evidence' 'statutory Interpretation' 'discretion to Exclude Evidence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Equity Proceeding / Evidence Admissibility Ruling

Legal Issues

1 ["Whether a director's letter complaining of incorrectness of minutes is admissible as a business record under s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995" 'Whether such representations were made in the course of or for the purposes of the business' 'Whether the evidence should be excluded under s 135 of the Evidence Act 1995']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application to exclude evidence dismissed; letter admitted as business record evidence.

Orders

["Representations in director's letter admitted under s 69 of Evidence Act 1995 and not excluded under s 135."]