Calder v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] FCAFC 254
The dominant purpose of Mr Calder in entering into the Tea Tree oil plantation scheme, assessed objectively by reference to the factors in s 177D(b), was to obtain a tax benefit. The trial judge’s evaluative findings were open on the evidence and did not disclose appellate error. The features of the scheme, including prepayment, borrowing, and structure, supported the finding of a tax-dominated purpose.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Full Court Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['income Tax' 'deductions' 'tax Avoidance' 'pt IVA Income Tax Assessment Act 1936' 'dominant Purpose of Tax Benefit' 'commercial Purpose Versus Tax Purpose']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Full Court Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Mr Calder's dominant purpose in entering into the Tea Tree oil plantation scheme was to obtain a tax benefit within the meaning of Pt IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth)" "Whether the trial judge erred in concluding that Mr Calder's purpose was primarily tax-related rather than commercial"]
Ratio Decidendi
The dominant purpose of Mr Calder in entering into the Tea Tree oil plantation scheme, assessed objectively by reference to the factors in s 177D(b), was to obtain a tax benefit. The trial judge’s evaluative findings were open on the evidence and did not disclose appellate error. The features of the scheme, including prepayment, borrowing, and structure, supported the finding of a tax-dominated purpose.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment