Michael Cassino v National Australia Bank Ltd [2001] NSWIRComm 336
The applicant has established sufficient cause to justify an order waiving the fifty document limit under Rule 161(2), as access to the documents is reasonably needed for the purposes of conciliation and the process will not impose undue difficulty or expense on the respondent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S.106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders made granting waiver of Rule 161(2) limitation and directing response to the notice to produce within 14 days; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['practice and Procedure' 'notice to Produce' 'discovery' 'unfair Contract' 'conciliation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S.106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the limitation in Rule 161(2) to fifty documents should be waived for the notice to produce' 'Whether notice to produce or discovery is the appropriate process for access to more than fifty documents prior to conciliation']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant has established sufficient cause to justify an order waiving the fifty document limit under Rule 161(2), as access to the documents is reasonably needed for the purposes of conciliation and the process will not impose undue difficulty or expense on the respondent.
Court Disposition
Orders made granting waiver of Rule 161(2) limitation and directing response to the notice to produce within 14 days; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Limitation in Rule 161(2) of the Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996 waived for the Notice to Produce served on 14 November 2001.' 'The respondent is directed to respond to the notice to produce served on 14 November 2001 within 14 days of the order.' 'Costs of the motion are reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment