MIFSUD, Michael Charles v R [2009] NSWCCA 313
The evidence permitted a conclusion that the taking of the wallet, if done by the appellant, was distinct from the earlier violence in the unit. The jury's question showed that this was a live issue. A larceny verdict was not fanciful and would have been a viable and rational outcome; the failure to leave that alternative required the conviction to be set aside and a new trial ordered.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Conviction and Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; new trial ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['robbery in Company' 'larceny as an Alternative Verdict' 'appeal Against Conviction' 'jury Directions' 'new Trial']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Conviction and Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial judge misdirected the jury by not leaving larceny as an available alternative verdict to robbery in company.' 'Whether, on the evidence, a verdict of larceny would have been a viable and rational outcome rather than fanciful.' 'Whether the conviction for robbery in company should be quashed and a new trial ordered.']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence permitted a conclusion that the taking of the wallet, if done by the appellant, was distinct from the earlier violence in the unit. The jury's question showed that this was a live issue. A larceny verdict was not fanciful and would have been a viable and rational outcome; the failure to leave that alternative required the conviction to be set aside and a new trial ordered.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; new trial ordered.
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed' 'Conviction quashed' 'A new trial be held']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment