Trowbridge v Morris [2010] NSWADT 18
The applicant is not entitled to most compensation claimed due to lack of evidence and merit, but was entitled to a limited rent-free period and minor compensation. The respondent’s claim for rent arrears is accepted as supported by the rental schedule and uncontested by the applicant. The respondent is entitled to costs from the hearing on 1 June 2009 and subsequent written submissions due to the applicant's unmeritorious and unnecessarily prolonged conduct.
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Charles Trowbridge; Respondent: Voula Morris
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Retail Tenancy Dispute / Final Decision After Hearing and Written Submissions
- Outcome
- Applicant to pay respondent rent arrears and costs.
- Legal Topics
- Rent Arrears, Lease Disputes, Compensation Claims, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Charles Trowbridge
Applicant
Voula Morris
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Retail Tenancy Dispute / Final Decision After Hearing and Written Submissions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to compensation for losses allegedly arising from flooding and other breaches of lease by the respondent
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a rent-free period and/or rent reduction
- 3 Whether the respondent is entitled to rent arrears
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is not entitled to most compensation claimed due to lack of evidence and merit, but was entitled to a limited rent-free period and minor compensation. The respondent’s claim for rent arrears is accepted as supported by the rental schedule and uncontested by the applicant. The respondent is entitled to costs from the hearing on 1 June 2009 and subsequent written submissions due to the applicant's unmeritorious and unnecessarily prolonged conduct.
Court Disposition
Applicant to pay respondent rent arrears and costs.
Orders
- The applicant is to pay the Respondent an amount of $1,244.35.
- The applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs, as agreed or assessed, of the hearing on 1 June 2009 and the written submissions filed on her behalf in accordance with the directions made on that day.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment