Cleere v. Matic Service Pty. Ltd. [No. 2] [2005] NSWCA 176
Respondent's pre-trial offer of compromise is only a relevant factor among many; appellant's substantial success in economic loss components warrants 80% of costs; absence of renewed offer during appeal and lack of appellant delinquency preclude indemnity costs for respondent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Respondent to pay 80% of appellant's costs of the appeal, party/party basis; respondent may have certificate under Suitors Fund Act if entitled; parties to bring in Short Minutes of Order.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'offer of Compromise' 'contributory Negligence' 'damages' 'appeal Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appellant is entitled to the entirety of his costs despite partial success on appeal' 'Whether respondent should have indemnity costs based on pre-trial offer of compromise' 'How pre-trial offers affect appeal costs' "Impact of appellant's success on economic loss awards on costs allocation"]
Ratio Decidendi
Respondent's pre-trial offer of compromise is only a relevant factor among many; appellant's substantial success in economic loss components warrants 80% of costs; absence of renewed offer during appeal and lack of appellant delinquency preclude indemnity costs for respondent.
Court Disposition
Respondent to pay 80% of appellant's costs of the appeal, party/party basis; respondent may have certificate under Suitors Fund Act if entitled; parties to bring in Short Minutes of Order.
Orders
- ["Respondent to pay 80% of appellant's costs of the appeal assessed on a party/party basis." 'Respondent to have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act 1951 (NSW) if so entitled.' 'Parties directed to bring in Short Minutes of Order in accordance with these reasons and those given on 10 December 2004.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment