Scott v Mason [2021] NSWCATAP 151

Scott v Mason [2021] NSWCATAP 151

The appellant failed to demonstrate any error of law or substantial miscarriage of justice; he had proper notice and opportunity to participate; procedural fairness was afforded; the findings at first instance were not against the weight of evidence nor procedurally unfair. Leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Michael Craig Scott; Respondent: Jotham Mason
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 May 2021
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal (residential Tenancy) / Appeal Application for Leave to Appeal and Dismissal
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Termination of Tenancy on Harassment/intimidation Grounds, Procedural Fairness, Leave to Appeal Criteria, Urgent Application Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Craig Scott

Appellant

Jotham Mason

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Internal Appeal (residential Tenancy) / Appeal Application for Leave to Appeal and Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was denied procedural fairness in the first instance hearing
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal’s decision was not fair and equitable or against the weight of evidence
  3. 3 Whether a substantial miscarriage of justice has occurred

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to demonstrate any error of law or substantial miscarriage of justice; he had proper notice and opportunity to participate; procedural fairness was afforded; the findings at first instance were not against the weight of evidence nor procedurally unfair. Leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal refused.
  • Appeal dismissed.