Egan v Willis [1998] HCA 71
The Legislative Council of NSW possesses by implication the power, reasonably necessary for the proper exercise of its functions as a legislative chamber under a system of responsible government, to order one of its members (including a minister) to table State papers and to suspend that member for a limited period if he refuses to comply. The power to suspend, when used to coerce compliance and not as punishment, is a defensive measure within the Council's necessary privileges. The High Court affirmed that such questions of privilege are justiciable where legal rights (such as an action for trespass) are at issue, but absent statutory foundation, declaratory relief should not be granted...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court of Australia Judgment on Appeal From New South Wales Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['legislative Powers and Privileges' 'responsible Government' 'compulsion of State Papers' 'powers of Legislative Chambers' 'suspension and Discipline of Members' 'separation of Powers' 'justiciability']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court of Australia Judgment on Appeal From New South Wales Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Legislative Council of NSW has implied power to order a member/minister to table government documents and to suspend for non-compliance' 'Whether the Court may adjudicate (justiciability) upon questions of parliamentary privilege and the validity of chamber resolutions' 'The scope and source of privileges of Australian State legislative bodies, particularly the NSW Legislative Council']
Ratio Decidendi
The Legislative Council of NSW possesses by implication the power, reasonably necessary for the proper exercise of its functions as a legislative chamber under a system of responsible government, to order one of its members (including a minister) to table State papers and to suspend that member for a limited period if he refuses to comply. The power to suspend, when used to coerce compliance and not as punishment, is a defensive measure within the Council's necessary privileges. The High Court affirmed that such questions of privilege are justiciable where legal rights (such as an action for trespass) are at issue, but absent statutory foundation, declaratory relief should not be granted...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment