Regina v Michael HUANG [2005] NSWCCA 244

Regina v Michael HUANG [2005] NSWCCA 244

The additional evidence regarding fortification and security elements on the premises did not negate the sentencing judge's finding that the offender's participation was in a highly organised and ongoing heroin distribution business. The sentence imposed, including the non-parole period and the degree to which the statutory ratio was varied for special circumstances, was within the scope of sentencing discretion and not manifestly excessive.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 June 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Sentence; Appeal Determination
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['sentence Appeal' 'supplying Prohibited Drugs' 'manifest Excess' 'special Circumstances' 'drug Addiction' 'objective Seriousness']
['criminal Law'] ['sentence Appeal' 'supplying Prohibited Drugs' 'manifest Excess' 'special Circumstances' 'drug Addiction' 'objective Seriousness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Sentence; Appeal Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether sentence was manifestly excessive' 'Whether new evidence as to fortification of premises should affect assessment of objective seriousness' 'Whether special circumstances were properly reflected in non-parole period' 'Relevance of early-onset drug addiction to mitigation']

Ratio Decidendi

The additional evidence regarding fortification and security elements on the premises did not negate the sentencing judge's finding that the offender's participation was in a highly organised and ongoing heroin distribution business. The sentence imposed, including the non-parole period and the degree to which the statutory ratio was varied for special circumstances, was within the scope of sentencing discretion and not manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']