Byron Shire Council v Fletcher [2005] NSWLEC 706
The appropriate penalty is determined by weighing the objective seriousness of the unlawful clearing (which is low in this case), the defendant’s state of mind (intentional conduct but mistaken belief and lack of deliberate defiance), the absence of prior convictions, co-operation with authorities, and an early guilty plea, resulting in a fine of $20,000 and an order for payment of costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing Following Plea of Guilty
- Outcome
- Conviction and sentencing
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Clearing' 'development Consent' 'sentencing' 'environmental Harm' 'local Environmental Planning Instruments']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing Following Plea of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant unlawfully cleared trees without development consent' 'Determination of appropriate sentence for unlawful tree clearing']
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate penalty is determined by weighing the objective seriousness of the unlawful clearing (which is low in this case), the defendant’s state of mind (intentional conduct but mistaken belief and lack of deliberate defiance), the absence of prior convictions, co-operation with authorities, and an early guilty plea, resulting in a fine of $20,000 and an order for payment of costs.
Court Disposition
Conviction and sentencing
Orders
- ['The defendant is convicted of the offence as charged.' 'The defendant is fined in the sum of $20,000.' "The defendant is to pay the prosecutor's costs in these proceedings in the agreed sum of $13,000."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment