Moses v Ratner [2022] NSWSC 1234
On the balance of probabilities, the joint venturers agreed Mr Ratner would build the townhouses for the amended sum of $1,850,000; Mr Moses' liability for building costs is limited to one half of this sum, subject to a $200,000 adjustment between the parties for difference in property values.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Final Judgment, Orders for Taking of Accounts
- Outcome
- Declaration that construction cost under joint venture is $1,850,000; plaintiff liable for one half, subject to $200,000 adjustment. Accounts to be taken between parties; if not agreed, referral to expert for calculation.
- Legal Topics
- ['joint Venture Agreement' 'construction Contract' 'oral Agreements' 'taking of Accounts' 'quantum Meruit Claims']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Final Judgment, Orders for Taking of Accounts
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was an oral agreement as to a fixed sum for construction in the joint venture' 'Whether the building costs were to be based on a fixed price or a rate per square metre' 'Entitlement to payment for building works based on quantum meruit']
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, the joint venturers agreed Mr Ratner would build the townhouses for the amended sum of $1,850,000; Mr Moses' liability for building costs is limited to one half of this sum, subject to a $200,000 adjustment between the parties for difference in property values.
Court Disposition
Declaration that construction cost under joint venture is $1,850,000; plaintiff liable for one half, subject to $200,000 adjustment. Accounts to be taken between parties; if not agreed, referral to expert for calculation.
Orders
- ['The costs of construction for the project are set at $1,850,000 under the joint venture agreement.' 'Plaintiff is liable for one half of the $1,850,000 construction cost.' 'Plaintiff must credit the defendants $200,000 for the property value adjustment.' 'If parties cannot agree on accounting and determination of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment