BAR-MORDECAI v. HILLSTON [2003] NSWSC 1269
Leave to prosecute was refused and the proceedings were summarily dismissed because the alleged charges were not expressed in any recognisable or usable form, did not identify sufficiently when, where, or in what proceedings perjury was committed, relied on material already adjudicated rather than objective further...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Prosecute for Perjury Under Crimes Act Subs. 338(1)(c) / Summary Disposal
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['perjury' 'leave to Prosecute' 'summary Dismissal' 'vexatious Proceedings' 'apprehended Bias']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Prosecute for Perjury Under Crimes Act Subs. 338(1)(c) / Summary Disposal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should grant leave under Crimes Act Subs. 338(1)(c) to prosecute Mr Alexander Hillston for perjury.' 'Whether Bryson J should disqualify himself for actual bias or apprehended bias.' 'Whether the proceedings should be summarily dismissed as vexatious.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to prosecute was refused and the proceedings were summarily dismissed because the alleged charges were not expressed in any recognisable or usable form, did not identify sufficiently when, where, or in what proceedings perjury was committed, relied on material already adjudicated rather than objective further material showing falsity, and amounted to a vexatious attempt to relitigate factual findings while related appeal proceedings were being pursued.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The proceedings be dismissed with costs.' 'The appointment for hearing in October is vacated.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment