Michael John Charles Caiger [1993] NSWLST 14
Leave was granted because, despite the seriousness of the Applicant's dishonesty offences, the Tribunal was comfortably satisfied that the proposed employment would not materially increase risk to the public or undermine public confidence. The proposed role was confined to office management systems, involved no legal or paralegal work, no client contact about matters, no access to practice accounting passwords, and general supervision by Paul Anthony Curtis or another partner. The Tribunal accepted the Applicant's evidence of genuine contrition, voluntary confession before detection, prompt restitution with interest, cooperation with police, otherwise unblemished record, and persuasive...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 121 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 for Leave to Be Employed and Paid in Connection With the Practice of a Solicitor / Determination by the Legal Services Tribunal of New South Wales After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ["leave for Person Convicted of Indictable Offences to Be Employed in Solicitor's Practice" 'protection of the Public' 'public Confidence in the Legal Profession' 'dishonesty Offences' "conditions on Employment in a Solicitor's Practice"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 121 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 for Leave to Be Employed and Paid in Connection With the Practice of a Solicitor / Determination by the Legal Services Tribunal of New South Wales After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Michael John Charles Caiger, who had been convicted of indictable offences involving forgery, uttering and misappropriation of funds, should be granted leave under Section 121 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 to be employed and paid in connection with the practice of Paul Anthony Curtis.' 'Whether the proposed employment would materially increase risk to the public or undermine public confidence in the law and the profession.' "Whether leave should be granted subject to conditions limiting the nature of the applicant's work and supervision."]
Ratio Decidendi
Leave was granted because, despite the seriousness of the Applicant's dishonesty offences, the Tribunal was comfortably satisfied that the proposed employment would not materially increase risk to the public or undermine public confidence. The proposed role was confined to office management systems, involved no legal or paralegal work, no client contact about matters, no access to practice accounting passwords, and general supervision by Paul Anthony Curtis or another partner. The Tribunal accepted the Applicant's evidence of genuine contrition, voluntary confession before detection, prompt restitution with interest, cooperation with police, otherwise unblemished record, and persuasive...
Court Disposition
Application granted; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['Leave pursuant to Section 121 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 was given to Michael John Charles Caiger to be employed and paid in connection with the practice of Paul Anthony Curtis as a consultant for a period of six months from commencement of employment or for such longer period as may be necessary to fully...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment