R v Michael John CHRISTIAN [2009] NSWDC 375
Mr Christian had been convicted of a serious personal violence offence and had a prior conviction for armed robbery for which he served a prison sentence, making him a repeat offender under s 9D. His desire to attend Family Court proceedings concerning his daughter did not amount to exceptional circumstances justifying bail, so bail could not be granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Law Bail Application / Post Conviction, Pending Sentence
- Outcome
- The application for bail is refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['bail Application' 'serious Personal Violence Offence' 'repeat Offender' 'exceptional Circumstances' 'break and Enter and Commit Serious Indictable Offence in Company']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law Bail Application / Post Conviction, Pending Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s 9D of the Bail Act 1978 applied because the offence was a serious personal violence offence and Mr Christian was a repeat offender.' "Whether Family Court proceedings concerning one of Mr Christian's daughters amounted to exceptional circumstances justifying the grant of bail."]
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Christian had been convicted of a serious personal violence offence and had a prior conviction for armed robbery for which he served a prison sentence, making him a repeat offender under s 9D. His desire to attend Family Court proceedings concerning his daughter did not amount to exceptional circumstances justifying bail, so bail could not be granted.
Court Disposition
The application for bail is refused.
Orders
- ['The application for bail is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment