R v Hansen [2022] NSWDC 746
The late served Facebook Messenger evidence was excluded because the prosecution failed to comply with mandatory pre-trial disclosure obligations without proper explanation, despite long-standing awareness of the possible messages; the evidence was imperfectly obtained and incomplete; the defence could not properly test matters affecting its context, date, source and authenticity; and admitting it would cause actual procedural unfairness and manifest prejudice to the accused. The Court was not satisfied that waiver under s 148 was in the interests of the administration of justice, and under s 137 the probative value of the late served evidence was outweighed by the danger of unfair...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Procedural Rulings in Trial on Indictment / Pre Trial Hearing Concerning Late Disclosed Evidence, Tendency Notice and Other Evidentiary Rulings
- Outcome
- Late served evidence excluded; tendency notice not further dealt with; other evidentiary rulings made.
- Legal Topics
- ['pre Trial Disclosure' 'case Management Orders' 'exclusion of Evidence' 'unfair Prejudice' 'tendency Evidence' 'relationship Evidence' 'complainant Sexual Experience Evidence' 'good Character Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Procedural Rulings in Trial on Indictment / Pre Trial Hearing Concerning Late Disclosed Evidence, Tendency Notice and Other Evidentiary Rulings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether late served evidence concerning Facebook Messenger messages should be excluded under s 146 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) and/or s 137 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).' 'Whether the Court should waive pre-trial disclosure requirements under s 148 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW).' "Whether the Crown's late tendency notice should be addressed if the late served evidence was excluded." 'Whether evidence of the lookout incident and taxi incident should be admitted.' "Whether evidence of a text message about the complainant's prior sexual experience should be admitted under s 294CB of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW)." "Whether part of the accused's video interview concerning the complainant's sexuality should be excluded." 'Whether the accused could adduce good character evidence in the particular respect of having no arrests or convictions for sexual offences.']
Ratio Decidendi
The late served Facebook Messenger evidence was excluded because the prosecution failed to comply with mandatory pre-trial disclosure obligations without proper explanation, despite long-standing awareness of the possible messages; the evidence was imperfectly obtained and incomplete; the defence could not properly test matters affecting its context, date, source and authenticity; and admitting it would cause actual procedural unfairness and manifest prejudice to the accused. The Court was not satisfied that waiver under s 148 was in the interests of the administration of justice, and under s 137 the probative value of the late served evidence was outweighed by the danger of unfair...
Court Disposition
Late served evidence excluded; tendency notice not further dealt with; other evidentiary rulings made.
Orders
- ['The statement of the complainant dated 24 August 2022 is excluded pursuant to s 146 of the Criminal Procedure Act and/or s 137 of the Evidence Act.' "The photographs of the complainant's mobile phone and video recording of the conversation between the complainant and DSC Vallette during which those photographs...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment