Hudson v Lee (No 2) [1993] HCA 58
The ground asserted in the petition was not one of bribery, corruption, undue influence, or illegal practice as defined by s. 352(1) of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. Section 362 exhaustively governs grounds for invalidating elections, and thus the Court had no jurisdiction to declare the election void on the basis claimed. The petition must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Electoral Petition / Final Judgment and Costs Order
- Outcome
- petition dismissed; Commonwealth to pay respondent's costs
- Legal Topics
- ['election Petitions' 'court of Disputed Returns' 'costs Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Electoral Petition / Final Judgment and Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court of Disputed Returns has power to declare an election void on the grounds alleged in the petition' "Whether the Commonwealth should be ordered to pay the respondent's costs"]
Ratio Decidendi
The ground asserted in the petition was not one of bribery, corruption, undue influence, or illegal practice as defined by s. 352(1) of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. Section 362 exhaustively governs grounds for invalidating elections, and thus the Court had no jurisdiction to declare the election void on the basis claimed. The petition must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed; Commonwealth to pay respondent's costs
Orders
- ['Petition dismissed.' 'Liberty to the first and second respondents to file and serve written submissions as to costs within seven days.' 'Liberty to the petitioner to file and serve reply submissions within seven days of service.' 'Commonwealth to pay Michael John Lee the amount of costs incurred by him in the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment