R v Sonter [2005] NSWCCA 458
The court found error in the arithmetical calculation of the non-parole period relative to the total sentence, resulting in an unduly short period for parole and rehabilitation. The sentence was varied to adjust the non-parole and parole periods to better reflect statutory proportions and provide opportunity for successful parole.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Michael John Sonter
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; sentence varied
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Multiple Offences, Parole, Form 1 Procedure, Aggravating Factors, Error in Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Michael John Sonter
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was error in the sentencing process regarding the period of supply and Form 1 documentation
- 2 Whether the applicant's prior record was incorrectly treated as an aggravating factor under s 21A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
- 3 Whether the non-parole period was inappropriate as a proportion of the total sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The court found error in the arithmetical calculation of the non-parole period relative to the total sentence, resulting in an unduly short period for parole and rehabilitation. The sentence was varied to adjust the non-parole and parole periods to better reflect statutory proportions and provide opportunity for successful parole.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; sentence varied
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted and the appeal allowed in part.
- Sentence for ongoing supply of prohibited drug quashed; in lieu, applicant sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years five months commencing 9 December 2004 and expiring 8 May 2008, and a parole period of one year seven months commencing 9 May 2008.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment