Joseph v Spencer (No 5) [2021] NSWLEC 139
There is no apparent legitimate forensic purpose or relevance in requiring Ms Spencer to produce documents relating to her accommodation in Queensland, as these documents do not bear on the matters in dispute in the proceedings. The requirements of s 108A of the Evidence Act are not engaged, as there is no 'previous representation' to which it could apply.
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Joseph; First Respondent: Ricardo Spencer; Second Respondent: Jennifer Spencer
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Notice of Motion to Set Aside Notice to Produce
- Outcome
- Notice to Produce to the Court No 3 addressed to Ms Spencer is set aside
- Legal Topics
- Notice to Produce, Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act, Evidentiary Relevance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Joseph
Applicant
Ricardo Spencer
First Respondent
Jennifer Spencer
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Notice of Motion to Set Aside Notice to Produce
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Notice to Produce to the Court No 3 discloses any legitimate forensic purpose relevant to issues in dispute
- 2 Whether s 108A of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) justifies requiring compliance with the Notice
Ratio Decidendi
There is no apparent legitimate forensic purpose or relevance in requiring Ms Spencer to produce documents relating to her accommodation in Queensland, as these documents do not bear on the matters in dispute in the proceedings. The requirements of s 108A of the Evidence Act are not engaged, as there is no 'previous representation' to which it could apply.
Court Disposition
Notice to Produce to the Court No 3 addressed to Ms Spencer is set aside
Orders
- The Notice to Produce to the Court served by the Applicant on the Second Respondent and entitled Notice to Produce to the Court No 3 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment