Regina v Bell [2005] NSWCCA 81

Regina v Bell [2005] NSWCCA 81

The sentencing judge provided appropriate leniency for the applicant's voluntary disclosure and plea of guilty, but given the serious intentional homicidal conduct, a four-year sentence was not manifestly excessive and reflected proper discretionary judgment.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['attempt to Strangle With Intent to Kill' 'sentencing' 'mitigation' 'plea of Guilty']
['criminal Law'] ['attempt to Strangle With Intent to Kill' 'sentencing' 'mitigation' 'plea of Guilty']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether sentencing judge gave appropriate allowance for matters of mitigation, particularly voluntary disclosure and guilty plea' 'Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive']

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge provided appropriate leniency for the applicant's voluntary disclosure and plea of guilty, but given the serious intentional homicidal conduct, a four-year sentence was not manifestly excessive and reflected proper discretionary judgment.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed']