Kingsbury v Melbourne City Mission [2024] FCA 1390
There is insufficient evidence to suggest the applicant has a tenable claim of unlawful age-based discrimination. Accordingly, leave to commence a proceeding under s 46PO of the AHRC Act is refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Kingsbury; First Respondent: Melbourne City Mission; Second Respondent: Department of Families, Fairness and Housing; Third Respondent: HousingFirst
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Commence Proceeding Under S 46 PO of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (cth) / Application for Leave Dismissed
- Outcome
- Application for leave dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination, Leave to Commence Proceedings, Provision of Social Housing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Kingsbury
Applicant
Melbourne City Mission
First Respondent
Department of Families, Fairness and Housing
Second Respondent
HousingFirst
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Commence Proceeding Under S 46 PO of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (cth) / Application for Leave Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant has a tenable claim of unlawful age-based discrimination
- 2 Whether leave should be granted to commence proceedings under s 46PO of the AHRC Act
Ratio Decidendi
There is insufficient evidence to suggest the applicant has a tenable claim of unlawful age-based discrimination. Accordingly, leave to commence a proceeding under s 46PO of the AHRC Act is refused.
Court Disposition
Application for leave dismissed
Orders
- The applicant be refused leave to make an application to this Court pursuant to s 46PO of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) concerning the allegations of unlawful discrimination that were the subject of his complaint lodged with the Australian Human Rights Commission on 14 November 2023 and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment