Lehner v The Owners – Strata Plan No 65870 [2023] NSWCATAP 102
Leave to appeal is refused and the appeal dismissed because the Tribunal did not miscarry its discretion in awarding costs for late withdrawal; the appellant failed to show an error of principle or manifestly unreasonable application of s 60 and established authorities, and new evidence was inadmissible as it was available at the time of the hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision on Leave and Merits
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Orders' 'appeal Procedure' 'withdrawal of Application' 'special Circumstances' 'exercise of Discretion']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision on Leave and Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Should leave to appeal be granted in the context of a costs order following withdrawal of proceedings?' 'Did the Tribunal err in exercising its discretion under s 60 of the NCAT Act to award costs in the circumstances?' 'Can the appellant rely on new evidence on appeal?' "Did the Tribunal fail to take into account the respondent's conduct in withholding the consent issue until the final hearing?"]
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal is refused and the appeal dismissed because the Tribunal did not miscarry its discretion in awarding costs for late withdrawal; the appellant failed to show an error of principle or manifestly unreasonable application of s 60 and established authorities, and new evidence was inadmissible as it was available at the time of the hearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is refused.' 'The appeal is dismissed.' 'Each party is to pay their own costs of the appeal proceedings.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment