Gardiner v Nominal Defendant [2006] NSWDC 122
The explanation provided by Mr Gardiner for both the purposes of ss 43(a) and 52(4) Motor Accidents Act 1988 was full and satisfactory, and it is probable that damages will exceed the statutory threshold. In the absence of prejudice preventing a fair trial, it is fair and just to extend time for commencement of proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Commence Proceedings / Ex Tempore Judgment on Application
- Outcome
- leave granted to commence proceedings
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'full and Satisfactory Explanation' 'damages Threshold']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Commence Proceedings / Ex Tempore Judgment on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['whether the applicant provided a full and satisfactory explanation for delay in lodging the claim' 'whether likely damages would exceed the statutory threshold for commencing proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
The explanation provided by Mr Gardiner for both the purposes of ss 43(a) and 52(4) Motor Accidents Act 1988 was full and satisfactory, and it is probable that damages will exceed the statutory threshold. In the absence of prejudice preventing a fair trial, it is fair and just to extend time for commencement of proceedings.
Court Disposition
leave granted to commence proceedings
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 52(4) Motor Accidents Act 1998, the applicant is granted leave to commence proceedings in respect of the injuries suffered in the motor vehicle accident on 5 July 1999.' 'A statement of claim is to be filed and served not later than twenty-eight days after it is agreed between the applicant and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment