Lowe v R [2023] NSWCCA 169
Leave to appeal against sentence granted as errors were established in failing to apply a discount for assistance and in incorrectly applying discount for guilty plea; however, neither error warranted a lesser sentence on resentencing, and the original sentence was sufficiently lenient given the objective seriousness of the offences.
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Lowe; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Appeal Against Sentence, Aggregate Sentencing, Discount for Guilty Plea, Assistance to Authorities, Supply of Drugs, Dealing With Proceeds of Crime
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Lowe
Applicant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentencing judge erred by failing to apply discount for assistance on s 193 Offence
- 2 Whether sentencing judge erred by applying plea discount to aggregate sentence rather than to indicative sentences
- 3 Whether lesser sentence was warranted on re-sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal against sentence granted as errors were established in failing to apply a discount for assistance and in incorrectly applying discount for guilty plea; however, neither error warranted a lesser sentence on resentencing, and the original sentence was sufficiently lenient given the objective seriousness of the offences.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal against sentence is granted.
- Appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment